Archive for the ‘Study’ Category

Top 8 Reasons to Embrace Intrapreneurship

Wednesday, March 10th, 2010

Klaus-Peter Speidel and Kristen Koch reviewed sources on- and offline to find the top eight reasons you and your organization should embrace intrapreneurship.

The place for intrapreneurship

Now that “Open Innovation” is such a buzzword, many companies understand that it is more efficient to adopt the ‘proudly found elsewhere’ model than to outright reject ideas because they were “not invented here.”

Before you start looking for outside ideas, though, it’s important to get your internal idea- and solution-management right. Companies that don’t have any processes for managing solutions internally may have a hard time using solutions from the outside. One way to channel internal potential for innovation is through internal start-up programs, or intrapreneurship.

Why should corporations embrace intrapreneurship?

(more…)

Vision 2050: Business Arguments for Sustainability

Thursday, February 25th, 2010

The Vision 2050 report, released on February 4th, sets out an agenda for sustainable growth over the next 40 years. The world’s population is expected to grow to 9 billion by 2050, and if current growth continues, those people will use 2.3 planets’ worth of resources—which we obviously don’t have. Vision 2050 presents a different, happier picture, the “best possible vision: in 2050, some 9 billion people live well, and within the limits of the planet.” But if we actually want this to happen we’ll have to act fast; instead of calling for ethical behavior, the study concludes that companies that don’t go sustainable will actually start to lose money.

(more…)

Five for Friday (Five4Five) #1: A Casual Roundup of the Best Online Research Tools

Friday, January 15th, 2010


1. Mendeley:  iTunes for your .pdfs

Why is Mendeley so cool?  Because it’s like iTunes for research papers — if iTunes let you access your musical library remotely, annotate albums and share them with friends.

Mendeley’s goal is to create a giant network of socially-annotated research libraries. Its aim is fostering interaction and connection among researchers in all fields. Store your unmanageable collection of pdfs and share them with your research team. Save notes and comments, then avail them to others.

But the best feature — at least for those of us drowning in pdfs — is the possibility to organize digital docs by topic, or according to the different articles you’re writing. By making comments and research notes available along with research article metadata and citations, this tool will bring joy to the lives of many researchers — that is, once all the social features are up and running (it’s still a relatively new service).

Finally, Mendeley replicates aspects of web-based reference managers: by extracting, storing and exporting references from the library, it allows users to quickly create formatted bibliographies. But it’s more complimentary to these services than competitive; you can import and export citations, for example, between Mendeley and CiteUlike and Zotero.

Sadly, like iTunes, it can’t extract data from everything you drop on. A recent test found this reviewer manually editing reference information for 00034bdg.pdf.  It should be especially helpful for teaching and collaborative paper writing, since it allows a team of researchers to share references and store them in a commonly accessed collection.
-Milan Stankovic, PhD@hypios

2. CiteULike: Spreading the Bibliographic Metadata

Unless keeping track of citations with index cards is your thing, you’re probably using either a web-based citation manager (Connotea, CiteUlike, Zotero) or the popular but costly EndNote.  Whatever you’re using, here’s probably what you want to be able to do: extract and export citational data from any web-based document (blog post, JSTOR article) as easily as you can retweet or Digg.  Then you want to be able to access citations (wherever you are) to whip-up a perfectly formatted bibliography in the time it takes to put together a playlist.

(more…)

Massively Collaborative Mathematics: lessons from polymath1

Wednesday, January 13th, 2010

science news.org

Context: About a year ago, on January 27th, 2009, Fields Medalist Tim Gowers, asked a provocative question on his blog:  “Is something like massively collaborative mathematics possible?” Is it possible to sove a difficult mathematics problem collectively following the principles of distributed computing (everyone pitches in a little to arrive at a result that seemed out of reach for the invidual)?  Gowers took an experimental approach to his own question.  He decided to try to find an elusive (elementary) proof for a famous and high-impact mathematics theorem using - simply enough - the comments section of his Wordpress blog. Joining him in the quest was fellow Fields medalist Terence Tao.

The Problem: Gowers was seeking a combinatorial proof of the density Hales-Jewett theorem (DHJ).  H-J is usually explained with reference to a tic-tac-toe game (played in multiple dimensions). To get the gist of it, visualize such a game played in multiple dimensions with multiple sets of squares. Then ask yourself how many squares you would have to block off to prevent the other player from winning? Using this image of the game, DHJ states that the more dimensions you have, the more squares you would have to block off. Fascinating in its own right, the theorem rests in a pretty active mathematical space, so work on the problem would likely have a larger-than-average effect.

(more…)

Questions questioned: About Google’s Project 10tothe100 FAQ

Friday, December 18th, 2009

Image 1Actually this started as a blogproject. I thought FAQs a subject rich and specific enough to justify a whole blog but I realized that I wouldn’t have enough time to maintain it. So I decided to just merge my first post onto the hypios blog. If someone wants to start an FAQ blog, I’d love to hear from you.

The basic ideas are these:

The FAQ is nearly like the index.html: a must for any respectable website that offers more than information.

It is a hybrid. It is and isn’t really part of the website.

In that sense it is somewhat like the index of a book. It’s only somewhat part of it—a supplement that can be established by other people than the authors of the book.

But the FAQ says a lot more about a website than it explicitly states.

Sometimes I feel like the FAQ is the fast track to a website’s subconscious, revealing the things it is ashamed of or the secret pre-occupations of its users. Here’s the FAQ that gave me the idea:

http://www.project10tothe100.com/faq.html

“At Google, we don’t believe we have the answers, but we do believe the answers are out there. Maybe in a lab, or a company, or a university—but maybe not. Maybe the answer that helps somebody is in your head, in something you’ve observed, some notion that you’ve been fiddling with, some small connection you’ve noticed, some old thing you have seen with new eyes.”

(more…)

Is Twitter a Ponzi scheme?

Wednesday, November 18th, 2009

I recently came across a presentation on Slideshare that —even if very simplistic— formalized something I have been thinking about for a few weeks: could Twitter be a kind of unintentional, original and refined Ponzi scheme in the domain of marketing? A giant pyramid that will topple if more bricks aren’t added every day?

Disclaimer: We love Twitter
We use it every day. We get a lot of interesting information from it, we have many followers, we follow many people, we made some interesting contacts on it, but…

But…Twitter isn’t that good

Sure, Twitter is a good product.  The application interface is accessible and wide open. It’s a real-time social bookmarking tool that’s original in terms of virality and network recommendation. This stream fits with some people’s needs to organize content. But honestly, it’s not that good. Following too many people (something that we, @hypios, admittedly do, as we follow pretty much everyone who follows us) makes the stream change so quickly that it’s impossible to really ‘follow.’ Follow fewer people, though, and it gets boring; you’ll just see the same excessive twitterers on your network.

Then there’s the functionality. I won’t go too far into that, but  it’s maddening that there’s no ’select all and delete’ option for the 200 daily automated direct messages you’ll get (which are not at all distinguished, by the way, from the real ones).  You have to click on every single one of them. “Delete all” a feature that you have with every simple email account. I’ll stop here, but to reiterate, it’s not that good.

(more…)